It’s engaging and difficult job to maintain adequate level of liquidity
in the economic system so as it encourages growth in economic activities but
not having any adverse impact on inflation and interest rate. For this central
banks in consultation with the governments, sometimes infuses liquidity and
sometimes sucks it out as money supply in the system should neither be very
high to induce inflation nor very low to restrict growth in economic
activities. However political endeavors always may not be so rationale to keep
these facts in mind when making promised for political gains.
NYAY has been proposed by Congress leadership which promises Rs 72000
every year to 20% poorest families in country. This has started a discussion
among economists. Some are finding this to be the best way to pull out the poor from poverty. However there is a spectrum of large number of economists who
find this scheme fiscally imprudent as they fear that it will lead to high
fiscal deficit which will have negative impact on exchange rate, inflation and
interest rate which would reverse the business cycle leading to high level of
unemployment hence lower lever of disposable income. One thing must be very clear that arranging money is not a problem. Problem will rise as how it is being arranged and implemented.
Moreover a few in the
party say that this scheme would not cost single penny to the exchequer. This
still raise a lot of concerns as where this money of three lakhs sixty thousands
crores will come from. Does it purpose to bring down expenditure on other
social security schemes? On the other hand there are many in the party who
claims that no existing social security scheme would be affected by the NYAY.
NYAY though may look lucrative in its promises, but implemented it will
lead a number of obstacles and difficulties. Rs 72000 every year to poorest 5
crores families would be Rs 3.6 trillion every year. This amount would be
around 3% of GDP and is 13% the total central government expenditure for
2019-2020. This figure itself tells how it will impact fiscal deficit which is
at 3.4 and the government is struggling to bring it below 3%. So on this
account, this scheme would fiscally prudent for the exchequer.
Also there is concern about the sustainability of the scheme. The
expenditure on this scheme is not expected to be linked to assets creation and
without creating assets to support economy; this scheme will fall as the time
will pass. We have already witnessed that the expenditure on the MNREGA has not
yielded much besides money transfer and corruption in implementation. And
finally government was forced to attach this scheme to other development
schemes to create social assets.
Irrespective of the claims made by a number of economists, this scheme
will surely push the inflation upward because of higher liquidity; particularly
the food inflation. It may cause upward movement in interest rates. The
ramifications of these might be far grave than expected.
There would be a number of difficulties in implementing this fairly and
transparently. Today there is not single comprehensive
database about the incomes of Indian nationals from which the incomes of
nationals can be identified while selecting beneficiaries for cash transfers. Till
December 2018, as per Income Tax Department only 6.05 crore individuals have
filed ITR and none of these are expected to be beneficiary this scheme. So
rests of the population would have to be considered to be eligible as there is
no way left to track and link income. Here the problem will start. However Ayushman Bharat may be helpful.
There is
high risk that many eligible and needy families would be left out from benefits as
everyone will try to grab this opportunity to augment his income by Rs. 72000
by cancelling their real income. Now imagine how miserable will be life of left
out poor!! And the difficulty is that the Supreme Court has specifically made
it clear that linking Aadhar to bank account unconstitutional, so are any
effort to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment